4231Since 2018, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) was supposed to serve as America\u2019s shield\u2014protecting elections from foreign interference, preventing cyberattacks on voting systems, and guiding states through threats ranging from misinformation to emergency disruptions. But today, as the 2026 midterms approach, that shield is cracking\u2014and the federal government is the one swinging the hammer.<\/p>\n
In this month\u2019s elections across several states, CISA was nearly absent. No meaningful coordination, no proactive threat monitoring, no substantial support. For many election officials, this disappearance is a warning sign of what\u2019s coming: a federal government willing to gamble with national security and the democratic process in exchange for political priorities and budget cuts.<\/p>\n
Under the Trump administration, CISA has been hollowed out. Funding slashed. Programs dismantled. Expertise removed. Nearly 1,000 employees<\/strong> have lost their jobs in just a few years. This March alone, Republicans cut $10 million<\/strong> from cybersecurity programs\u2014money that previously helped state and local officials safeguard elections.<\/p>\n And the damage is not limited to budgets. The FBI quietly dismantled its foreign influence task force, the very group responsible for investigating election interference by hostile governments. CISA\u2019s election team, once central to national security, has seen a dozen staff members suspended as the agency undergoes an undefined and chaotic \u201creview.\u201d<\/p>\n To make matters worse, CISA doesn\u2019t even have a permanent director. Trump\u2019s nominee, Sean Plankey, is stalled in the Senate, leaving the agency leaderless at a moment when cybersecurity threats are escalating worldwide.<\/p>\n Election officials across the country are sounding the alarm. Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon says states are already scrambling to fill the gaps: \u201cWe don\u2019t know if CISA will even be there for us in 2026.\u201d The bipartisan National Association of Secretaries of State pleaded with Homeland Security to preserve CISA\u2019s core election functions. Months later, they are still waiting for answers.<\/p>\n Even large states like California\u2014often seen as cybersecurity leaders\u2014say CISA has nearly abandoned them. For the state\u2019s November special election, the agency provided almost no support. California officials say plainly that CISA\u2019s ability to safeguard elections has \u201csignificantly decreased\u201d due to sweeping cuts in staff, funding, and mission focus.<\/p>\n Meanwhile, CISA leadership insists everything is fine. Press statements claim the agency is \u201cworking tirelessly\u201d to protect the nation, yet offer no clear plans, no transparency, and no reassurance to those who actually administer elections.<\/p>\n This is not strength. It is neglect.<\/p>\n At a time when cyberattacks are increasing, foreign governments are expanding misinformation campaigns, and U.S. political divisions are deepening, America is choosing to weaken its last line of defense. Instead of reinforcing election security, Washington is dismantling it piece by piece\u2014leaving states alone to face threats they were never meant to handle.<\/p>\n The result is a nation more vulnerable than at any time in the last decade. The institutions meant to protect democracy are shrinking, understaffed, leaderless, and uncertain of their own future.<\/p>\n America likes to portray itself as a global defender of democracy. Yet at home, it cannot even defend its own elections.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" 4231Since 2018, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) was supposed to serve as America\u2019s…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":10405,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[5119],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\n